4.3 Documenting Research
Professional Genealogy suggests three books to use as guides in creating solid citations: The Chicago Manual of Style, Evidence Explained, and Genealogy Standards.1 One goal of this course is for students to have a positive, personalized experience while learning to improve their research skills; therefore, in an attempt to keep citations from becoming a barrier to that goal, citations will be presented in three styles throughout this textbook. Whichever style is utilized, each citation should be created in that style for all coursework. Sample citations for different record types will be displayed in each of the three styles within the coordinating chapter. Utilizing the ctrl-f “find” function and searching for the record type will quickly bring up citation style samples.
The first, and most accessible, citation style is Chicago Style. Since family history falls under the umbrella of history, it is reasonable to use history citations in genealogy. Be aware that some documents cited in family history may not be specifically addressed in The Chicago Manual of Style, but there are many websites, helps, and guides to assist students in creating Chicago Style citations. Often universities have websites or subscribe to services that demonstrate Chicago Style citations. History departments may also have physical resources or helpful books, like A Pocket Guide to Writing in History,2 with samples of Chicago Style citations for different types of sources.
Second, to address the concern that certain types of citations are not always clearly defined in Chicago Style, professional genealogists use methods developed by Elizabeth Shown Mills and outlined in her work Evidence Explained to cite records commonly utilized in family history research. “Evidence Explained is the go-to guide for all who explore the past, guiding users through the maze of materials not covered by other citation manuals.”3 This citation style will be referenced as Evidence Explained Style. Citations created following Evidence Explained Style are complex and thorough. Mills claims that “Evidence Explained is a guidebook for all who explore history and seek to piece together its surviving bits and shards. As a guide, it is built on one basic thought: We cannot judge the reliability of any information unless we know exactly where the information came from; and the strengths and weaknesses of that source.”4
Citations created following Chicago Style or Evidence Explained Style will do two things: provide enough information that someone could find the original source based on the citation and give the researcher patterns to follow in creating consistent citations. However, because family history is a discipline that relies heavily on emerging technologies, some argue that it is time to modernize citations. The history of Chicago Style goes back to the late nineteenth century and the creation of the Chicago University Press, which developed a pamphlet in 1903 that evolved into a book released in 1906 as Manual of Style: Being a compilation of the typographical rules in force at the University of Chicago Press, to which are appended specimens of type in use.5 The manual is, as of January 2025, in its 18th edition.6 Evidence Explained was first printed in 20077 at a time when the methods genealogists utilized to access records leaned to the physical instead of being electronic. In the first decade of the twenty-first century, it was common for researchers to utilize microfilm and other physical resources that, over time, have been digitized and are available electronically for modern researchers.
Both Chicago and Evidence Explained Styles recommend elements within citations that may not be necessary to meet the criteria. For example, both of these methods require the researcher to include full urls within the citation; besides the fact that a url can be gangly, complex, and unattractive, the time researchers spend typing or copying things like “https://www...” may be better spent in research. It is easy for historians to embed links within the citation text without readers being offended at the sight of them. Incorporating a url within the citation may also be fruitless because researchers may access records through paid memberships, student accounts, library services, or other methods that cannot be reproduced by the general public. By embedding the link, the information is still available to a researcher who can use it, but it is not written out in full text, taking space and making the citation difficult to manage. The text of the citation, without the url, should be effective in leading other family historians to the source but an embedded link is a bonus for easy access for those who can use it. Additionally, when adding sources to FamilySearch.org, there is a data field specifically for url so the entire text of the url does not need to be repeated in the citation.
Image numbers have not traditionally been included in citations but, because many collections are now digitized, including them can work as a hint for future researchers. The number of images and image number together suggest the researcher has found the right collection before they spend time opening individual images.
A third citation style will be referred to as Sensible Citation Style and is an effort to overcome some of these complexities while still creating excellent citations and allowing for as much time as possible to be spent on other aspects of a project. Crafting citations is vital to family history, but it should not be an activity that causes angst or takes an unnecessary amount of time away from research and writing. Sensible Citation Style follows Chicago Style whenever possible but is customizable for each student; this is important because all the vital parts of the citation needed to find the source are necessary, but they can be arranged in a way that makes sense to that researcher. This encourages consistency in the organization of saved documents and files. The key elements of a Sensible Citation Style citation include the following:
-
Collection
-
Primary name/names documented in the record
-
Type of event
-
Date of event
-
Place of event
-
Repository
-
Scope of collection (indexes, images, etc.)
-
Indentifying information (such as page number, line number, image number, etc.)
-
Embedded link (when possibile and appropriate)
-
Access date
Information that is vital for others to quickly find the source should be included, but the order in which they are presented is left to the individual researcher. Once a genealogist chooses the order of the essential elements, this same order must be followed consistently throughout the project.
There are times when an identifier that is listed in one of the citations styles cannot be included. This may be because the document does not contain the information, something on the record is illegible, or for other reasons. When this happens, skip that element of the citation and go on building with the next part of the citation. The citation should include as many of the prescribed elements as possible.
As previously noted, there are sample citations presented throughout the textbook, and they are shown in each of the three citation styles. Here is a sample of a book citation shown in Chicago Style, Evidence Explained Style, and Sensible Citation Style.
CHICAGO STYLE:
Author’s name, title and subtitle in italics, start parenthesis then place of publication: name of publisher, year of publication and end parenthesis, page numbers.8
Heather Andrea Williams, Help Me to Find My People (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2012), 136-138.
EVIDENCE EXPLAINED:
Author’s name, title and subtitle in italics, descriptor when necessary, start parenthesis then place of publication: name of publisher, year of publication and end parenthesis, page or figure or other information.9
Heather Andrea Williams, Help Me to Find My People (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2012), 136-138.
SENSIBLE CITATION:
Follows Chicago Style for physical books (see above).
Heather Andrea Williams, Help Me to Find My People (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2012), 136-138.
Create a system for saving documents and images tied to a project. For example, starting the name of a saved file with the year of the event it documents means the files are listed in chronological order.
This will be very helpful later when reports need to be written. Some researchers prefer all files are listed by name of the primary individual addressed in the record, or a researcher may give each individual a number to identify files that pertain to them. Others may want files organized by record type. Just like selecting a citation style, consistency is key; determine a system and stick to it for the duration of the project.
Want to try our built-in assessments?
Use the Request Full Access button to gain access to this assessment.